Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Johnson v. Aguilar
as 26-40369
Plaintiff:
Kwhun Johnson
Defendant:
F. Aguilar, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Warden, Rosalinda Trevino, Texas Department of Criminal Assistant Warden, J. Villasana, Lieutenant Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Shelton (PS) v. Fitzgerald et al
as 1:2026cv02714
Plaintiff:
Mark Shelton
Defendant:
Mark Fitzgerald, Anita Whitehead, Stefani Dills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Whittington v. People of the State of California
as 26-3883
Petitioner:
CHAD FITZGERALD WHITTINGTON
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Smith v. State of South Dakota et al
as 5:2026cv05080
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edgar Smith
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, Eighth (Fourth) Judicial Circuit Court, County of Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02384
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ali v. Denton County, Texas et al
as 4:2026cv00625
Plaintiff:
David Rasheed Ali
Defendant:
Denton County, Texas, Michelle Haiduk, Craig Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. State of Louisiana
as 26-30350
Plaintiff:
Laura Woods
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, David Smith, Judge Kyzar and others
Shamburger v. Howard
as 5:2026cv00937
Plaintiff:
Stephen Fitzgerald Shamburger
Defendant:
Jaluan Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Kemp et al
as 1:2026cv03032
Plaintiff:
Kyrima Anderson
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Burt Jones, Christopher Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. D'Agostino
as 26-1404
Defendant:
STEVEN G. JAMES, MAE A. D'AGOSTINO, JOSEPH F. BIANCO and others
Plaintiff:
ETHAN DAVIS SMITH and JENNIFER LYNN DEES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
