Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Taylor v. Flaco et al
as 2:2026cv00779
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor and Minister Popcorn
Defendant:
A. Flaco and Kwik Mart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Amezcua
as 26-780
Defendant:
ROBERT AMEZCUA, Robert Amezcua Herrera, Robert Amezqua and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Punks, LLC v. El Molcajete, Inc.
as 1:2025cv00370
Plaintiff:
Punks, LLC
Defendant:
El Molcajete, Inc. doing business as Flaco's Mexican Restaurant & Cantina
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
United States of America v. Amaya?Sanchez (Villalta)
as 25-1263
Defendant:
OMAR ANTONIO VILLALTA, EDWIN AMAYA-SANCHEZ, WILLIAM CASTELLANOS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith, et al. v. Elevado Drinks, LLC, et al.
as 1:2025cv00571
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith and Jason Ferguson
Defendant:
Elevado Drinks, LLC, Chaco Flaco Drinks, LLC, Hop the Wave Brewing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Amaya (Cabrera)
as 25-213
Defendant:
JESUS CABRERA, MICHAEL AMAYA, ALBERTO CONCEPCION and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Betancourt-Perez
as 24-1801
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGEL ABNER BETANCOURT-PEREZ, a/k/a El Flaco
GOMEZ v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P. et al
as 2:2024cv04421
Defendant:
WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, WALMART STORES INC., LAWSON AMANKWAH and others
Plaintiff:
JUANA GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Contreras
as 24-4568
Defendant:
Skinny Jack, JESSE CONTRERAS and Flaco
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Amaya-Sanchez (Hernandez)
as 24-352
Defendant:
EDWIN AMAYA-SANCHEZ, WILLIAMS CASTELLANOS, ELMER ALEXANDER LOPEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
