Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Valdez v. Mendoza et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jorge Valdez
Defendant:
Elsa Elena Mendoza doing business as Fletes Mendoza and Ramon Enrique Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flete-Garcia v. Stover
as 3:2023cv00746
Petitioner:
Furvio Flete-Garcia
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cervantes Lugo v. TruVision, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02524
Plaintiff:
Juan Martin Cervantes Lugo
Defendant:
TruVision, Inc., Noel Fletes and Zulma Fletes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Harrison v. City of Salinas et al
as 3:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Alvin Harrison
Defendant:
City of Salinas, Victor Cortina, Jose Luis Fletes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flete-Garcia v. Nash
as 3:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Fulvio Flete-Garcia
Defendant:
J. Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Corral v. Mefra Fletes SA DE CV et al
as 7:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Corral
Defendant:
Mefra Fletes SA DE CV and Juan Almaraz Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Linlor v. Conn et al
as 3:2022cv01806
Plaintiff:
James Linlor
Defendant:
Justin Conn, Leonard Fletes, John Doe's #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Gomez et al v. Mefra Fletes SA DE CV et al
as 1:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Gomez and Ronald Vasquez
Defendant:
Mefra Fletes SA DE CV and Alberto Guadalupe Alvarez Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flete-Garcia v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01145
Petitioner:
Fulvio Flete-Garcia
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flete-Fulvio v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01057
Petitioner:
Fulvio Flete-Garcia
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
