Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wendell Locke v. Charles Canady, et al
as 22-13971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDELL TERRY LOCKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES CANADY, RICKY POLSTON, JORGE LABARGA and others
Not Classified By Court:
ERWIN ROSENBERG
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-12910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-12723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-12709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
King v. State of Florida Supreme Court et al
as 2:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Nikie King
Defendant:
State of Florida Supreme Court, West Palm Beach Police Department, Department of Children and Families and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Nasa Headquarters et al
as 2:2022cv10039
Plaintiff:
Carmela Lynn Jackson
Defendant:
Nasa Headquarters, Donald Trump, Michigan First Credit Union and others
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. CANADY et al
as 4:2021cv00163
Defendant:
JOSHUA E DOYLE, FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, ALAN LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
MADISON B TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHESTNUT v. CANADY et al
as 4:2019cv00271
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT
Defendant:
JOHN TOMASINO, CLERK FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, CHARLES CANADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
