Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Anselme et al v. Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women et al
as 3:2020cv00005
Plaintiff:
Viviana Anselme and Alysha Honeycutt
Defendant:
Raheem Ramsey, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, Sgt. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cynthia Scott v. Harold Clarke
as 19-1719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELISSA ATKINS, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CYNTHIA SCOTT, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and TONI HARTLOVE, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
KAREN CHANITA POWELL, LUCETIA ROBINSON, BOBINETTE D. FEARCE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL TARGONSKI, in his official capacity as Medical Director for the Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, ERIC ALDRIDGE and others
Cynthia Scott v. Harold Clarke
as 19-1687
Plaintiff:
MARGUERITE RICHARDS, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, REBECCA L. SCOTT, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, PATRICIA B. KNIGHT, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC ALDRIDGE, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INCORPORATED, PAUL OHAI, a/k/a John/Jane Doe, M.D., Medical Director, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, DR. M. MILITANA, Medical Director, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TONI HARTLOVE, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MELISSA ATKINS, CYNTHIA SCOTT, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Jones, Administrator of the Estate of ARLENE DUKE, THE DECEDENT, deceased v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00517
Defendant:
Dr. Melissa Morton-Fishman, MD, C. Brown, LPN, Dr. Paul C. Ohai, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Georgia Jones, Administrator of the Estate of ARLENE DUKE, THE DECEDENT, deceased
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piper Rountree v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PIPER ANN ROUNTREE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLENE DAVIS, Assistant to Gary L. Bass, Virginia Department of Corrections, PHYLLIS BASKERVILLE, Prior Warden, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, GARY L. BASS, Regional Adminstrator Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Natalia Wilson v. Tammy Brown
as 16-7628
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATALIA LESHCHENKO WILSON
Respondent - Appellee:
TAMMY BROWN, Warden of the Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women
Holly Landry v. Phyllis Baskerville
as 14-6631
Petitioner - Appellant:
HOLLY LANDRY
Respondent - Appellee:
PHYLLIS BASKERVILLE, Warden, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women
Thomas v. Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women
as 1:2011cv01201
Petitioner:
Erica Monique Thomas
Respondent:
Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Teresa Lewis v. Barbara Wheeler
as 09-4
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERESA WILSON LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
BARBARA J. WHEELER, Warden, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women
Harmon v. Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women et al
as 7:2007cv00080
Plaintiff:
Candice Elzabeth Harmon
Defendant:
Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, B. J. Wheeler and Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
