Cases 31 - 40 of 170
WEEMS v. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03961
Plaintiff:
MARGO A WEEMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITORS, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHUKWU v. NJ STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2022cv05490
Plaintiff:
OBIOMA CHUKWU
Defendant:
NJ STATE POLICE and DET. D. FOOTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00964
Plaintiff:
Cornita Dennis, Scarlett Butcher, Corey Miettinen and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
YANG v. TAIJI ORIENTAL SPA NJ CORP et al
as 2:2022cv01617
Plaintiff:
YUCHEN YANG
Defendant:
TAIJI ORIENTAL SPA NJ CORP doing business as Taiji Oriental Massage, TAIJI ORIENTAL BODYWORK & FOOT RUB CORP. doing business as Taiji Oriental Massage, ZHANG TAIJI SPA INC. doing business as Taiji Oriental Massage and others
Foote v. Scarhead
as 1:2022cv01000
Plaintiff:
Elephant Foote
Defendant:
Mangie Scarhead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Stanley Foote v. USA
as 22-1090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY FOOTE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ringland West, LLC v. M/V JAMSAM, et al
as 3:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Ringland West, LLC
Defendant:
M/V JAMSAM, a fifty-one (51) foot 2017 Leopard Power Catamaran, her engines, apparel, and appurtenances, etc., in rem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Foote v. USA
as 1:2021cv01904
Petitioner:
Craig Foote
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Digi Portal LLC v. Foot Locker, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01355
Plaintiff:
Digi Portal LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
