Cases 21 - 30 of 93
Foote v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2019cv01958
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Anthony Foote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Brisentine et al v. Northwest Tennessee Foot Clinic, PLLC et al
as 1:2019cv01122
Plaintiff:
April Brisentine, Wendy Brisentine and Amber Reeves
Defendant:
Dr. Elizabeth Lu and Northwest Tennessee Foot Clinic, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Lexington Foot and Ankle Center, PSC et al
as 5:2018cv00628
Defendant:
Lexington Foot and Ankle Center, PSC and Michael C. Allen
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Foote v. Degenhardt
as 2:2018cv00141
Defendant:
Deputy Daniel Degenhardt
Plaintiff:
Zachary Nathaniel Foote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foote v. Degenhardt
as 3:2018cv00530
Defendant:
Deputy Daniel Degenhardt
Plaintiff:
Zachary Nathaniel Foote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lexington Foot and Ankle Center, PSC et al v. USA
as 5:2018cv00283
Petitioner:
Lexington Foot and Ankle Center, PSC and Michael C. Allen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Womack v. Foote Construction (PLR2)
as 1:2018cv00051
Defendant:
Foote Construction
Plaintiff:
Jason Womack
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DeMarinis v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (TWP1)
as 1:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
Linda DeMarinis
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitling v. Whitling et al
as 1:2017cv00263
Defendant:
Lisa Kay Whitling, Molly Kay Foote, Spencer T Foote and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Craig Whitling
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Richardson et al v. Lexington Foot and Ankle Center, PSC et al
as 5:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Richardson and Ramona Brooks
Defendant:
Lexington Foot and Ankle Center, PSC , Michael C. Allen and Lexington Diabetic Center, PSC
Movant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
