Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Charles T Barnard et al v. Foot Traffic Shoes
as 2:2016cv09384
Plaintiff:
Charles T Barnard and Foot Traffic USA, L.L.C
Defendant:
Foot Traffic Shoes
Eel River Brewing Company, Inc. v. Duck Foot Brewing Company, LLC
as 2:2016cv06873
Defendant:
Does and Duck Foot Brewing Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eel River Brewing Company, Inc.
Retrospection Marketing v. Foot Locker, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00408
Plaintiff:
Retrospection Marketing
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kobace LLC v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
as 6:2016cv00300
Plaintiff:
Kobace LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Daniel Poneman v. Nike, Incorporated, et al
as 16-1531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL PONEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NIKE, INCORPORATED, an Oregon Corporation and FOOT LOCKER INCORPORATED, a New York Corporation
Vilox Technologies LLC v. Foot Locker Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01458
Plaintiff:
Vilox Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Foot Locker Inc and Footlocker.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chanel, Inc. v. chanel curry et al
as 0:2015cv60650
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
chanel curry, 104104, amery kip way and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Under A Foot Plant, Co. v. Exterior Design, Inc., et al
as 1:2015cv00871
Plaintiff:
Under A Foot Plant, Co.
Defendant:
Exterior Design, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. et al v. Vizant Technologies, LLC
as 1:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. and Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Defendant:
Vizant Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Lyden v. adidas America, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01586
Defendant:
Adidas International Marketing B.V., Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc., Foot Locker, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Lyden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
