Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Shunn v. Kootenai County et al
as 1:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Forrest Glenn Shunn
Defendant:
Kootenai County, Kootenai County P.A. and Judge Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shunn v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Forrest Glenn Shunn
Defendant:
IDOC, Warden Wesseler and Sgt. Smyth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shunn v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Forrest Glenn Shunn
Defendant:
Davis and Wesseler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shunn v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Forrest Glenn Shunn
Defendant:
IDOC, ISCI and Warden Wesseler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shunn v. Benson et al
as 1:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Gordon Benson, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Forrest Glenn Shunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00490
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hood v. Beattie et al
as 1:2019cv00386
Defendant:
Kurt Seppi, St. Luke's Children Hospital, Southworth Associates and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutherford v. City of Pocatello et al
as 4:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
James N. Rutherford
Defendant:
City of Pocatello , Pocatello Police Department , Scott Marchant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berkley North Pacific Group, LLC et al v. United State Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Berkley North Pacific Group, LLC and Continental Western Insurance Company
Defendant:
United State Department of Agriculture and United States Forrest Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
