Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Harris v. Alabama Department of Corrections(INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00789
Plaintiff: Kenneth Eugene Harris
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Tim Forte, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00744
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00745
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Crane v. Fort Payne, Alabama et al
as 4:2020cv00647
Defendant: D B, Fort Payne, Alabama, Randy Bynum and others
Plaintiff: Tosha Crane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Wilson et al
as 4:2019cv01717
Defendant: Matt Wilson and City of Fort Payne, Alabama
Plaintiff: Ellis Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Howell et al
as 7:2019cv01391
Defendant: Pastor Chris Hodges, Sgt. Brown, Sheriff Denis Green and others
Plaintiff: Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anaya et al v. City of Fort Payne Alabama We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00270
Plaintiff: Ryan Anaya and Chad Ward
Defendant: City of Fort Payne Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Fort Payne, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv01877
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: City of Fort Payne, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00601
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Davis et al
as 4:2017cv01321
Plaintiff: Stevie Eugene Wood
Defendant: David Davis, Pam Simpson, Jimmy Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?