Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Terry Digiovanni v. Pentagon, et al
as 17-56383
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERRY DIGIOVANNI
Defendant - Appellee: PENTAGON, DIA, National Security, HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Terry Digiovanni v. Pentagon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv08836
Defendant: AA Central Offices, AA Club, AA Club and others
Plaintiff: Terry Digiovanni
Rivera v. Fountain Lakes Associates L P
as 5:2016cv01590
Plaintiff: Juana Esmeralda Rivera
Defendant: Fountain Lakes Associates L P and Ironshore Specialty Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terry Digiovanni v. Federal Hierarchy, et al
as 15-56278
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERRY DIGIOVANNI
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL HIERARCHY, BARACK OBAMA, CHUCK HAGEL and others
Terry Digiovanni v. Federal Hierarchy et al
as 2:2015cv04587
Defendant: 1445 N. Boonville Avenue, 180 East Ocean Blvd., Long Beach, Los Angeles CA 90802, AA Central Offices and others
Plaintiff: Terry Digiovanni
W.T. Davis, et al v. Cutter Morning Star School, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1919
Plaintiff - Appellee: W.T. Davis, Individually and on behalf of a Class of Taxpayers of Garland County, Arkansas, Similarly Situated, and and Garland County Chapter of the N.A.A.C.P.
Defendant: Hot Springs School District, Arkansas, State of, Arkansas State Board of Education and others
Defendant - Appellant: Cutter Morning Star School District, Fountain Lake School District, Jessieville School District and others
The Greens At Fountain Lakes Condominium Association, Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Company
as 2:2014cv00151
Plaintiff: The Greens At Fountain Lakes Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant: Columbia Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
Foster et al v. Lindsey Management Company Inc et al
as 4:2013cv00421
Plaintiff: Sanston M Foster, IV , Sandra Smith , Heather Nelms and others
Defendant: Lindsey Management Company Inc , Fountain Lakes and Fountain Lakes Management Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
Little Rock School District v. Wilson Comm. Develop. Corp., et al
as 13-1483
Plaintiff - Appellee: Little Rock School District
Intervenor Plaintiff: North Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association, Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers, Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association and others
Interested Party: John Harrison
Plaintiff: Dale Charles, Robert L. Brown, Sr., Gwen Hevey Jackson and others
Defendant: North Little Rock School District, Pulaski County Special School District, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Arkansas Department of Education
Claimant: Office of Desegregation Monitoring
Intervenor Defendant: Blytheville School District, Bryant School District, Fort Smith School District and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellant: Wilson Community Development Corporation, Lighthouse Academies of Arkansas, Inc., Arkansas Virtual Academy and others
Lorene Joshua, et al v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 13-1488
Plaintiff: Little Rock School District, Dale Charles, Robert L. Brown, Sr. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: North Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association, Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers, Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association and others
Interested Party: John Harrison
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant: Lorene Joshua, Leslie Joshua, Stacy Joshua and others
Defendant: North Little Rock School District, Pulaski County Special School District, Pulaski County Board of Education and others
Defendant - Appellee: State of Arkansas
Respondent: Arkansas Department of Education
Claimant: Office of Desegregation Monitoring
Intervenor Defendant: Blytheville School District, Bryant School District, Fort Smith School District and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: Wilson Community Development Corporation, Lighthouse Academies of Arkansas, Inc., Arkansas Virtual Academy and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?