Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Lopez #178244 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Bobby Francisco Lopez
Defendant:
Ryan F Thornell and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-848
Petitioner:
LUCAS FRANCISCO FRANCISCO-LOPEZ and CANDELARIO FRANCISCO-REGINO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez-Escobar, et al. v. Garland
as 23-524
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO LOPEZ-ESCOBAR and SAMUEL ALFREDO LOPEZ-LANDAVERDE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Abimael Enrique Corea Lopez et al v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09080
Plaintiff:
Abimael Enrique Corea Lopez, Adan Edilber Cuadra Mejia, Adolfo Bladimiro Flores Cruz and others
Defendant:
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lopez v. Velocity Transport LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01414
Plaintiff:
Francisco Lopez
Defendant:
Velocity Transport LLC, Amazon.com, LLC, Amazon Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Lopez #178244 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Bobby Francisco Lopez
Defendant:
David Shinn and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Carlos Lopez v. Rosemary Ndoh
as 20-17295
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS FRANCISCO LOPEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ROSEMARY NDOH, Acting Warden
Lopez v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2020cv01972
Defendant:
Centurion of Arizona LLC, ACI-AZ Incorporated, Arizona, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
