Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Villa et al v. Penca Azul LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01941
Plaintiff:
Daimarely Villa and Deyalin Limon
Defendant:
Penca Azul LLC an Arizona company doing business as El Charro Hipster Bar & Cafe, Francisco Peralta and Rebeca Azul Peralta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Peralta
as 22-1444
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nasheen Martin and Jerome Owens
Defendant / Appellant:
Francisco Peralta
USA v. Francisco Peralta
as 21-11671
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANCISCO PERALTA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PERALTA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31857
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO PERALTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lluilema Garcia et al v. Francis General Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04323
Defendant:
Francisco Peralta, Antonia Pichisaca, Alex Peralta and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Lluilema Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Peralta et al v. American Security Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv23450
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Felix Peralta and Francisco Peralta
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635
Peralta et al v. American Security Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv23451
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Felix Peralta and Francisco Peralta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peralta v. United States of America
as 18-1227
Petitioner:
Francisco Peralta
Respondent:
United States of America
Abraham Valentin et al v. Robert Jackson et al
as 2:2015cv09011
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, Does, Robert Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dominguez, Frank Margarito Escobedo, Alejandro Francisco Peralta and others
Peralta v. United States of America
as 14-1536
Petitioner - Appellant:
Francisco Peralta
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
