Cases 31 - 40 of 248
Charles Duckett, Jr. v. Warden Frank Bishop
as 19-7660
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES EUGENE DUCKETT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND and WARDEN FRANK BISHOP
Roberts v. McMahan, et al
as 19-2057
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER ST. AMAND, Superintendent, CAROLYN ATKINS, Deputy Commissioner Maryland DOC, FRANK BISHOP, JR., Warden Maryland DOC at North Branch Institute and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON ROBERTS
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DEBURGO and PATRICK NERETTE
BAILEY v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2019cv03178
Petitioner:
THOMAS LEE BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GEN, NBCI WARDEN FRANK BISHOP, MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Donald Pevia v. Frank Bishop
as 19-7203
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND and WARDEN FRANK BISHOP
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD RAY PEVIA, JR.
Blackwell v. Bishop, Jr. et al
as 1:2019cv02307
Respondent:
Frank Bishop, Jr. and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Petitioner:
Jermaine Bernard Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diaz v. Bishop
as 8:2019cv02212
Defendant:
Warden Frank Bishop
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bogues v. Bishop, Warden
as 1:2019cv02035
Defendant:
Sgtc. Wedlock, L. Llewellyn, Nurse, Frank Bishop, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Ericky Bogues
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Maurice Stewart, Jr. v. Frank Bishop
as 19-6888
Defendant / Appellee:
SOCIAL WORKER I MONICA WILSON, CCMS II CHARLOTTE ZIES, LT. BRADLEY WILT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE BERNARD STEWART, JR.
Larry Davis v. Frank Bishop
as 19-6813
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND and WARDEN FRANK BISHOP
Larry Davis v. Frank Bishop
as 19-6776
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND and WARDEN FRANK BISHOP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
