Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Jones v. Forrest County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2008cv00008
Plaintiff:
Joe Frank Jones
Defendant:
Forrest County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jones
as 3:2007cv02148
Plaintiff:
Comred Williams
Defendant:
Frank Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Savannah Chatham Metro Police Department
as 4:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Jones
Defendant:
Savannah Chatham Metro Police Department and Harold Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2007cv81102
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Department of Corrections
as 9:2007cv81102
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2007cv00190
Plaintiff:
FRANK JONES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Edwards et al
as 4:2007cv00100
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Jones
Defendant:
Michael Edwards, William Lewis and Elizabeth Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2007cv21763
Plaintiff:
Frank Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv00951
Plaintiff:
FRANK JONES
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, SHARON M. BURKS, ROBERT S. BITNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2007cv00153
Plaintiff:
FRANK JONES
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, FRANK MCKEITHEN and STEVE RUTHERFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
