Cases 1 - 10 of 10
In re: Sandoval
as 22-1039
Petitioner:
WILLIAM FRANK SANDOVAL
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Sandoval v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2021cv02751
Petitioner:
William Frank Sandoval
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bao Hui Chen et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv00850
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith, Baldur Castro, Ying Wang and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Air Force, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Earl v. Simpson et al
as 5:2019cv01086
Respondent:
Simpson, Frank Sandoval and Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Sean Michael Earl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sandoval v. Adams County et al
as 1:2019cv00375
Defendant:
Lee Page, Corin M. Flannigan, Trevor Moritzski and others
Plaintiff:
William Frank Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. Raemisch, et al
as 17-1161
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM FRANK SANDOVAL
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, MICHAEL MILLER, Warden, Crowley Correctional Facility and CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN, Attorney General, State of Colorado
Sandoval v. Raemisch
as 1:2016cv01406
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch and Michael Miller
Petitioner:
William Frank Sandoval
Defendant:
Cynthia H. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2015cv02451
Plaintiff:
Eldra Miller
Defendant:
County of San Diego, San Diego Sheriff's Department, Deputy Michelle Storms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sandoval v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2012cv02036
Plaintiff:
Frank Sandoval
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals L L C, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandoval v. USA
as 1:2011cv01533
Plaintiff:
Frank Sandoval
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
