Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Solomon v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv00479
Plaintiff:
Frank Solomon
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda California Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Fedd v. Owens et al
as 1:2013cv01120
Plaintiff:
Frank Solomon Fedd
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Sharon Lewis, Vicki Barron and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010at00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
State Farm Mutual Auto Ins Co, et al v. Midtown Medical Center Inc, et al
as 10-4267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INS CO and STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC, RONALD NESTEL, FRANK SOLOMON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMUEL FISHMAN
Frank Fedd, Sr. v. Brian Owens, et al
as 10-11729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK SOLOMON FEDD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, Commissioner, THOMAS AMMONS, Warden, TERRY DUFFEY, Warden and others
Frank Solomon Fedd, Sr. v. Brian Owens, et al
as 10-10212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK SOLOMON FEDD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, Commissioner, THOMAS AMMONS, WARDEN TERRY DUFFEY and others
Fedd v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00096
Plaintiff:
Frank Solomon Fedd, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
State Farm Mutl Auto Ins Co, et al v. Midtown Med Ctr Inc, et al
as 09-2621
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTL AUTO INS CO and STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
Defendant - Appellant:
SIMON FISHMAN and MIRIAM FISHMAN
Defendant:
PAUL BOVE, MIDTOWN MED CTR INC, RONALD NESTEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
