Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 642
Taylor v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff: Franklin Taylor
Defendant: Jeff Neal and Turn Key Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stowe v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00827
Plaintiff: Jessie Franklin Stowe
Defendant: State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melka v. Franklin et al
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff: Dagim Melka
Defendant: Deputy Franklin, Brian Wetzell, City of Wylie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 24-30049
Plaintiff: Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant: John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Franklin III v. Erlandson et al
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff: Robert Leon Franklin III
Defendant: Eric Ryan Erlandson, Ronald Uselton and Philip Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 23-30922
Plaintiff: Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant: John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Franklin v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00804
Petitioner: Charles L. Franklin
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trackling v. Franklin
as 3:2023cv01578
Plaintiff: Sylvester Trackling
Defendant: Unknown Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. FCI El Reno
as 4:2023cv00999
Petitioner: Tom Morris and Tom Franklin Morris
Respondent: FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hill v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2023cv01577
Plaintiff: Curtis Hill
Defendant: Franklin Parish Detention Center and Anthony Lemoine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?