Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BREWER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00650
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN BREWER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
McKenzie v. Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
as 4:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
Larry W. McKenzie
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi , Franklin Brewer and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hogg v. Woodall et al
as 2:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
Wayne Charles Hogg
Defendant:
Ron Woodall, Mississippi Department of Corrections, April Meggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard McKinney v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 10-60245
Petitioner - Appellant:
HOWARD THOMAS MCKINNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and FRANKLIN BREWER, Warden, Stone County Correctional Facility
Nelson v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Daryal Thomas Nelson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Marylin Philpot, Franklin Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Watts v. Brewer
as 1:2008cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jimi Levar Watts
Defendant:
Franklin Brewer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pearson v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 08-60133
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES C PEARSON, SR., also known as Johnny Pearson
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and FRANKLIN BREWER, Warden
Pearson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2007cv00381
Petitioner:
James C. Pearson, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Franklin Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
