Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Frasier v. Pritchard et al
as 2:2023cv04163
Plaintiff:
Michael Frasier
Defendant:
Det. Pritchard, Officer Hall, North Charleston Police Department, S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Frasier v. Duncan
as 1:2022cv02165
Petitioner:
Moses Akhonaton Frasier
Respondent:
Stephen Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frasier v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2022cv01366
Plaintiff:
Dyshan Frasier
Defendant:
Georgetown County and State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Frasier v. Alden et al
as 4:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Assoc. Warden Bailey, Ridgeland Corr. Insti. Medical Staff, Assoc. Warden A. Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Frasier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frasier v. Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 4:2020cv04123
Defendant:
Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Michael Frasier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frasier v. USA
as 6:2020cv01848
Petitioner:
Joseph Nathaniel Frasier, IV
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. 13,830.82 dollars in United States Currency
as 3:2019cv01740
Defendant:
13,830.82 dollars in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Moses Frasier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
