Cases 1 - 10 of 11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WHEELER et al
as 1:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FRED L WHEELER, II and LANDSCAPE CENTER OF MAINE INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
US BANK TRUST NA v. PRETORIUS et al
as 2:2022cv00240
Defendant:
MELISA PRETORIUS, MELISA FILIPOS and JOHANNES F PRETORIUS
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST NA
Interested Party:
FRED FORSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MARCOU v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2019cv00159
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
FRED L MARCOU
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MARCOU v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2016cv00527
Plaintiff:
FRED L MARCOU, JR
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FKT RESORT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00496
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FKT RESORT MANAGEMENT LLC, FKT BAYLEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FRED W BAYLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
GOGUEN v. ROSS et al
as 1:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FRED GOGUEN
Defendant:
WILLIAM GARDNER, MIKE PARODY, JASON RAYMOND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAFONTAINE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2010cv00527
Plaintiff:
FRED ERNEST LAFONTAINE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SHERBURNE v. ROMANO et al
as 2:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
HOPE E SHERBURNE
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROMANO, MICHAEL BENNETT, FRED JONES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. MALONE
as 2:2008mc00203
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
LARRY D MALONE
Material_witne:
FRED WILLIAMS
GALLANT v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY CO
as 2:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
FRED C GALLANT
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY CO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
