Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Norris Perry v. Margo Wolfe
as 16-3229
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Norris Perry
Defendant:
Woodruff County Sheriff Department, By and through Stacy Barker and Freddie Hudson, Stacy Barker, Freddie Hudson, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Margo Wolfe, Police Officer, In Her Individual and Official Capacity
Perry et al v. Woodruff County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Norris Perry
Defendant:
Woodruff County Sheriff Department, Stacy Barker, Freddie Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Woodruff County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2012cv00179
Defendant:
Woodruff County Sheriff Department, Freddie Hudson, McCroy Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Norris Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Arkansas, State of, et al
as 4:1978cv00025
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of , Douglas W Harp , Lawrence E Gwyn and others
Intervenor:
Wendell Adams , Larry Astin , Ron Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
John Lee Riches v. Club Properties, et al
as 08-2980
Appellant:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Club Properties, Inc., James W. Rodgers, Individually and as Trustee of the Jim and Betty Rodgers Joint Revocable Trust and Betty Rodgers, Individually and as Trustee of the Jim and Betty Rodgers Joint Revocale Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Sherwood, Arkansas, Bill Harmon, Mayor, in his official and individual capacity, Lex Davis, in his official capacity as member of the Sherwood City Council and others
Rodgers v. Hudson et al
as 2:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Arthur Rodgers, Jr.
Defendant:
Freddy Hudson, Joe Sloakam and Woodruff County Arkansas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers v. Hudson et al
as 2:2008cv02033
Plaintiff:
Arthur Rogers, Jr
Defendant:
Freddy Hudson, Joe Sloakam and Woodruff, County of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
