Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
as 1:2023cv24363
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK JOHNSON
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD, A BERMUDA COMPANY a Foreign Corporation doing business as Norwegian Cruise Line and NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. a Bermuda Company doing business as Norwegian Cruise Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Frederick Johnson
as 21-10578
Defendant / Appellant:
FREDERICK JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50597
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK JOHNSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67692
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARION FREDERICK JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv00070
Defendant:
Charles Denson, Timothy Howard, Frederick Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Marjoram Orris Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Frederick Johnson
as 17-11451
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK JOHNSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015mc01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tonita Hall v. Warden, et al
as 13-14306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONITA LOUISE HALL, a.k.a. Louise Redditt
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, Metro State Prison, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE, Director of Risk Management Services Department of Administrative Services, FREDERICK JOHNSON and others
USA v. Frederick Johnson
as 12-11642
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FREDERICK JOHNSON
JOHNSON v. USA
as 3:2007cv00492
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
FREDERICK JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
