Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Smith v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC
as 0:2023cv03182
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Beers et al
as 3:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Brian Beers , Phillip Carter and Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Beers et al
as 2:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Brian Beers , Phillip Carter and Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Frederick Smith v. Desoto County Sheriff Dept., et al
as 16-3992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Desoto County Sheriff Department, Lake Village Police Department, State of Arkansas and others
Frederick Smith v. U.S. Department of Education, et al
as 16-3993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. Department of Education, Brian Beers, Special Agent and Phillip Carter, Former City Council Member
Smith v. Desoto County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Desoto County Sheriff Department, Lake Village Police Department, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Smith v. Rick McKelvey, et al
as 16-1726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Rick G. McKelvey, Officer and Arkansas State Police Department
Smith v. US Department of Education et al
as 3:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
US Department of Education, Brian Beers and Phillip Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. McGowan
as 3:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Mary McGowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Smith v. Secretary of State
as 3:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Secretary of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
