Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Banks v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv10958
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and US Attorney General William Barr
Petitioner:
Fredrick C. Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Buntin v. The Government of the State of Florida
as 3:2020cv01196
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dee Buntin
Defendant:
The Government of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fredricks v. Markel CATCo Investment Management LTD et al
as 1:2019cv10331
Defendant:
Markel CATCo Investment Management LTD and Markel Corporation
Plaintiff:
Alissa Fredricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant et al v. U.S. Bank, National Association, et al
as 1:2017cv12273
Plaintiff:
Kathleen B. Grant and Fredrick A. Grant
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Association and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Telesite, LLC v. City of Leominster et al
as 4:2017cv10665
Plaintiff:
Telesite, LLC
Defendant:
City of Leominster , City of Leominster Planning Board , John J Souza and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Nuzzo v. United States of America-Department of Veteran's Affairs
as 1:2016cv12576
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Nuzzo
Defendant:
United States of America-Department of Veteran's Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelley v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority et al
as 1:2016cv11634
Plaintiff:
Ashley Kelley
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Ivy Payne and Fredrick Olson
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Revaz et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 3:2016cv30037
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Revaz and Anna Revaz
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Gero, et al
as 14-1755
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY M. BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER GERO and CORRECTION OFFICER OPONASET
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
