Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Frost v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Frost
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neil McGinnis v. James Slayer, et al
as 23-2270
Petitioner / Appellant:
Neil McGinnis
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden James Slayer, North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Colby Braun and others
McGinnis v. Slayer et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Neil Adams McGinnis
Respondent:
Warden James Slayer, ND DOCR, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Serghori v. Guistwite et al
as 8:2022cv01726
Plaintiff:
Khalil Serghori
Defendant:
Kevin P. Guistwite and Brian Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Guistwite et al
as 8:2022cv01707
Plaintiff:
Anthony Banks
Defendant:
Kevin P. Guistwite and Brian Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Guistwite et al
as 8:2022cv01694
Petitioner:
Marlon Lerone Clark
Respondent:
Kevin P. Guistwite and Brian Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Guistwite et al
as 8:2022cv01695
Petitioner:
Channon Green, Jr.
Respondent:
Kevin P. Guistwite and Brian Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frost v. Warden
as 6:2022cv01911
Petitioner:
Robert Joe Frost
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Frost et al
as 8:2022cv01325
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Deon Bailey
Respondent:
Brian Frost and Kevin P. Guistwite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Frosh et al
as 8:2022cv01323
Petitioner:
Rasaun Murphy
Respondent:
Brian Frost, Kevin P. Guistwite and Frosh Brian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
