Cases 1 - 10 of 84
FUENTES v. J. PERRY & SONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01777
Plaintiff:
MANUEL FUENTES
Defendant:
J. PERRY & SONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilding v. Scranton CCC Center (SDTP) et al
as 3:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Shawn Wilding
Defendant:
Scranton CCC Center (SDTP), Scranton GEO, Jeffrey James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
VESPE v. FUENTES et al
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
FRANK VESPE
Defendant:
Roy Fuentes, Wand Topco, AMAZON.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FUENTES v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv02780
Plaintiff:
JAIME FUENTES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fuentes et al v. Philips RS North America LLC
as 2:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Edwin Fuentes and Brenda Hernaiz
Defendant:
PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
STOKES et al v. CARNEY
as 2:2021cv01435
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS FUENTES, JACQUAR STOKES, KELLY GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATRIUM INNOVATIONS INC. et al v. FUENTES et al
as 2:2020cv01719
Defendant:
PABLO FUENTES and JOHN DOES 1-100
Plaintiff:
PURE ENCAPSULATIONS LLC, ATRIUM INNOVATIONS INC. and HVL LLC doing business as DOUGLAS LABORATORIES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
