Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FULKERSON v. ASDM BEVERLY HILLS, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv04095
Plaintiff:
VICKI FULKERSON
Defendant:
ASDM BEVERLY HILLS, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FULKERSON v. BERRYHILL
as 3:2018cv00047
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
SARAH BETH FULKERSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ZAVODNIK et al v. GRAMELSPACHER et al
as 1:2017cv02077
Defendant:
BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLP, JAMES W. BRAUER, GERALD COLEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
GERSH ZAVODNIK and TATIANA ZAVODNIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKING v. LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2017cv00013
Defendant:
JOSEPH ADAMS, BEDFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIKE BRANHAM and others
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE BROOKING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULKERSON v. BURKE et al
as 2:2013cv00364
Defendant:
ALAN D. BURKE and ROSEMARY HIGGINS BURKE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FULKERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SRIVASTAVA v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2013cv00200
Defendant:
SARAH EVANS BARKER, GERALD BEPKO, BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLP and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN H. SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Srivastava PHD v. Daniels et al
as 2:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Carolyn H Srivastava PHD
Defendant:
Mitchell Daniels, Randall Shepard, Gregory Zoeller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Pashova v. Giest et al
as 1:2009cv00340
Plaintiff:
Raliza Pashova and Raliza Pashova
Defendant:
Scott Giest, Kurt Anderson, Beth Lehman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
