Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Fulmore et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00904
Plaintiff:
Earlene Fulmore and C. S.
Defendant:
Police Officers John Doe 1-6, The City of New York and Police Officer Mark Xylas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fulmore v. Pond et al
as 3:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fulmore, Sr.
Defendant:
Pond, Burgess and B. K. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixdalia Taime et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05086
Plaintiff:
Mixdalia Taime , Tammy Clayton , Jane E Goss and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation , Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mixdalia Taime et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as CAC/2:15-cv-09495
Plaintiff:
Mixdalia Taime , Tammy Clayton , Jane Goss and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. , McKesson Corporation and Does
Mixdalia Taime et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09495
Plaintiff:
Tammy Clayton, Cheryl Dafford, Robert G. Dafford and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Fulmore v. Butler et al
as 3:2015cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fulmore, Sr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Butler, Officer Jackson and Captain Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judith Smalley et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01224
Plaintiff:
Judith Smalley , Thomas G. Smalley , JoAnn Jones and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Judith Smalley et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as CAC/2:15-cv-01483
Plaintiff:
Judith Smalley , Thomas G. Smalley , Joann Jones and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. , McKesson Corporation and Does
Judith Smalley et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01483
Plaintiff:
Dovie Abshire, Joseph Abshire, Arlene Beard and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
FULMORE v. MEDICAL DEPARTMENT DOC
as 4:2014cv00683
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ROBERT FULMORE
Defendant:
MEDICAL DEPARTMENT DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
