Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Xie v. Univ TX MD Anderson
as 20-20622
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard Gonzalez, University of Texas at Houston Police Department, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Medical Doctor Keping Xie
DUNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv07102
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G DUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv60572
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G DUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunn v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv03159
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kimberly G Dunn and Kimberly Dunn
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Branch III v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00402
Defendant:
Sharon Barden and United States of America
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Clarence A Branch, 3rd
ThirdParty Defendant:
Megan Donley, Nancy G Dunn, Mark Langer and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Dunn v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Stacy G Dunn
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Taquan v. Sean et al
as 5:2017cv00479
Plaintiff:
Gullett Taquan
Defendant:
E. Sean, G. Dunn, M. Kleckner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Thomas Dunn
as 15-4423
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS G. DUNN
Bagby v. Dunn et al
as 5:2014cv00737
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
Nancy G. Dunn, Molly C. Dwyer and Joseph Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saracino v. Ruckelshaus et al
as 2:2014cv00882
Plaintiff:
Mark Saracino
Defendant:
William J. Ruckelshaus, Eric M. Emans, Andrew M. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
