Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tomas G. Machado v. State of California for the People
as 2:2022cv01288
Petitioner:
Tomas G. Machado
Respondent:
State of California for the People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Machado et al v. Chiodo et al
as 1:2017cv00304
Defendant:
Joseph L. Chiodo , Town of Johnston , Mark Vieira and others
Plaintiff:
Frank G Machado and Teresita Machado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Warner v. M. Martel, et al
as 12-17452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL WARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
M. MARTEL, Warden, W. KNIPP, MATHEW CATE and others
Rodriguez v. State of California et al
as 2:2012cv02688
Plaintiff:
Luis Valenzuela Rodriguez
Defendant:
State of California, Suzan Hubbard, Roseanne Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Machado v. Weare Police Department, et al
as 11-1147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER G. MACHADO
Defendant - Appellee:
WEARE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES CARNEY, ROBERT J. PETERSON and others
Machado v. Weare Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv00256
Defendant:
Daniel R. Aiken, Gregory C. Begin, James J. Carney and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Machado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bardo v. Martel et al
as 2:2009cv03479
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Bardo
Defendant:
M. Martel, M Lockhart, S Butcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rafael Lopez v. Martel, et al
as 09-17423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAFAEL LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTEL, Warden, M. HAMILTON, CCI and others
Warner v. Cate et al
as 2:2009cv01568
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
Mathew L. Cate, M. Martel, W. Knipp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vandervall v. Feltner et al
as 2:2009cv01576
Plaintiff:
Karl Vandervall
Defendant:
J Feltner, G. Machado, H. Lackner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
