Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Ronald Veteto v. Roy Hightower, et al
as 21-14126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD D. VETETO
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY HIGHTOWER, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, W. G. POWELL, Deputy Warden, in his individual and official capacity, DAVID STILL, Supervisor, in his individual and official capacity and others
Walker et al v. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01608
Defendant:
Jill Spylher, Paula Price, A. Scalia and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker and Maurice Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv01608
Defendant:
Jill Spylher, Paula Price, A. Scalia and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker and Maurice Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Powell et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Defendant:
Rsula G. Powell and Jimmy L. Powell, Jr
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Powell v. Owens et al
as 1:2018cv08125
Petitioner:
Willie G Powell
Respondent:
Angela M Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Abbas et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11527
Plaintiff:
John Bardak, Michael Santo, James Bevers and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Smith v. Israel et al
as 0:2018cv62098
Defendant:
Athol Clayton, J Greene, R Foust and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth M Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vidale v. Ferguson et al
as 0:2018cv61506
Defendant:
D. Ferguson, N Fawaz, G. Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Vidale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smallwood v. Pope et al
as 2:2017cv01517
Defendant:
K. Hogeland, D. Lilienthal, M. Pope and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Louis Smallwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Mason et al
as 1:2017cv01499
Plaintiff:
Bonnie G. Powell
Defendant:
Marvin Jamel Mason and Eastern Lift Truck Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
