Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hunsinger v. Allied Universal Security Services LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Allied Universal Security Services LLC and G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe Persons, Entities 1 through 10 and G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivas v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
as 1:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivas
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv09191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00544
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Conner v. Juarez et al
as 5:2015cv00528
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Officer Cody Davis, Dominion Homeowners' Association, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conner v. Juarez et al
as 5:2015cv00416
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Officer Cody Davis, Dominion Homeowner's Association, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
