Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Lewis v. Riverview, City of et al
as 5:2023cv12531
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Gail Lewis
Defendant:
Riverview, City of, Matthew Lyles and Michael McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09801
Plaintiff:
Gail Lewis
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis-Hicks v. Everest National Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv00334
Plaintiff:
Gail Lewis-Hicks
Defendant:
Everest National Insurance Company, Apex Parks Group, LLC and Unknown Operator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv17556
Plaintiff:
GAIL LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunbar v. Hammans et al
as 5:2020cv00595
Plaintiff:
Damon Neal Dunbar, Jr
Defendant:
Staci Hunter, Elaina Flores, Ricky McPhearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luis Duran v. Gail Lewis, et al
as 17-17057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS DURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GAIL LEWIS, JAMES A. YATES, Warden, J. L. SCHNEIDER and others
Demond Mimms v. Gail Lewis, et al
as 16-56868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMOND MAURICE MIMMS
Defendant - Appellee:
GAIL LEWIS and OSCAR PENA
Duran v. Lewis et al
as 1:2016cv00468
Plaintiff:
Luis Duran
Defendant:
Gail Lewis, James A. Yates, J. L. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duran v. Lewis et al
as 2:2016cv00285
Plaintiff:
Luis Duran
Defendant:
Gail Lewis, J Yates, J. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey v. Lewis et al
as 1:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Johnney Ramey
Defendant:
Gail Lewis, James A. Yates, Theresa A. Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
