Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lisa Johnson, et al v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 24-1028
Plaintiff:
LISA JOHNSON and GALE MILLER ANDERSON
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Johnson v. Amazon.Com Services, LLC.
as 1:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Lisa Johnson and Gale Miller Anderson
Defendant:
Amazon.Com Services, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Miller Anderson v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
as 1:2022cv06001
Plaintiff:
Gale Miller Anderson
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States of America v. 133 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Dorchester County, Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
133 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN DORCHESTER COUNTY, MARYLAND, UNKNOWN HEIRS OF ELMER HANCOCK, JUDITH PERRINE and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Miller v. The Town of Hempstead et al
as 2:2017cv07330
Plaintiff:
Gale Miller
Defendant:
Anthony Santino, The Town of Hempstead and Michael Zappola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Maynard, et al v. The Colorado Supreme Court, et al
as 11-1207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALISON MAYNARD and GERALD LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT OFFICE OF ATTORNEY REGULATION COUNSEL, APRIL MCMURREY, JOHN GLEASON and others
Consol Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM LUCERO, DAVID R. LASS, KAREN ROMERO and others
Lewis et al v. Gleason et al
as 1:2010cv01850
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lewis and Alison Maynard
Defendant:
John Gleason, James Coyle, April Seekamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITCH et al v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv62817
Plaintiff:
RONALD THOMPSON FITCH, RONALD THOMPSON FITCH, GALE MILLER and others
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
