Cases 1 - 10 of 40
GARCIA v. GARCIA-RAMOS et al
as 2:2026cv08321
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN GARCIA
Defendant:
GARCIA-RAMOS and AARON BEDOLLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1251
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BISIGNANI et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2026cv02823
Plaintiff:
BRIDGETTE BISIGNANI, GIOVANNI BISIGNANI and BRIDGETTE GARCIA-RAMOS
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02587
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01514
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01252
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00603
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2025cv00363
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Garcia-Ramos, et al. v. Blanche
as 25-7527
Petitioner:
OSCAR GARCIA-RAMOS, ROSARIO ELIZABETH CAHUA-VALDEZ DE GARCIA, PABLO ALFONSO GARCIA-CAHUA and others
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.