Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Scott v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others
Philips v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Mary Philips
Defendant:
Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others
Agarwal v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05680
Plaintiff:
Avantika Agarwal
Defendant:
Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others
Watts v. Steel et al
as 5:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Watts
Defendant:
Judge Gary Steel, Sammy McCreery, Philip Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burpee v. Flemming et al
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Burpee
Defendant:
Jacob Flemming, Hays County District Courts, Hays County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. City of Detroit, Michigan, A Municipal Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv10068
Plaintiff:
Ariel Moore
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Michigan, A Municipal Corporation, Gary Steele and Michael Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEELE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv18750
Plaintiff:
GARY STEELE and CAROLYN J STEELE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burpee v. Hays County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 5:2021cv00757
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Burpee
Defendant:
Hays County Law Enforcement Center, State of Texas, Mark Janssen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv04760
Defendant:
Jonathan Feiber, Dana Evan, Kevin Harvey and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
King v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05398
Defendant:
Jonathan Feiber, Kevin Harvey, Proofpoint, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Micah King
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
