Cases 1 - 10 of 29
MUFFLEY v. GRAHAM et al
as 4:2014mc00006
Respondent:
WILLIAM GRAHAM and ASHLEY WEAVER
Petitioner:
GARY W. MUFFLEY
Muffley v. Heck et al
as 3:2014mc00005
Plaintiff:
Gary W Muffley
Defendant:
Joseph Heck and Scott Gebhardt
Muffley, et al v. Cobalt Coal Ltd., et al
as 1:2014cv07350
Petitioner:
Gary W. Muffley and National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Cobalt Coal Ltd., Westchester Coal, L.P. and Cobalt Coal Corp. Mining Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Muffley v. Greer Mining, Inc.
as 6:2014cv00021
Petitioner:
Gary W. Muffley
Respondent:
Greer Mining, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muffley v. Elmo Greer & Sons, LLC
as 6:2014cv00020
Petitioner:
Gary W. Muffley
Respondent:
Elmo Greer & Sons, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muffley v. Rodgers et al
as 3:2013mc00012
Petitioner:
Gary W Muffley
Respondent:
Gary Rodgers and Kenton Beaty
Muffley v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2013mc00054
Plaintiff:
Gary W Muffley
Defendant:
Gary Rodgers and Kenton Beaty
Muffley v. Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc.
as 3:2013cv03831
Petitioner:
Gary W. Muffley and National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Gary Muffley v. Voith Industrial Services, Inc, et al
as 12-6628
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY W. MUFFLEY, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent - Appellee:
VOITH INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION NO. 862, AFL-CIO and UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
MUFFLEY v. ADVANCED METALS TECHNOLOGIES OF INDIANA, INC.
as 4:2012cv00148
Respondent:
ADVANCED METALS TECHNOLOGIES OF INDIANA, INC.
Petitioner:
GARY W. MUFFLEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
