Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CFL Technologies LLC v. General Electric Company
as 23-1082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CFL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and GE LIGHTING, LLC
LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION et al v. LEEDARSON LIGHTING CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2019mc00169
Respondent:
OSRAM GMBH, OSRAM OPTO SEMICONDUCTORS GMBH, MLS CO., LTD. and others
Not Classified By Court:
GLOBAL VALUE LIGHTING, LLC, HEALTHE INC. and LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
Lighting Science Group Corp. v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2019cv00806
Plaintiff:
Lighting Science Group Corp.
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Consumer Lighting (U.S.), LLC, Current Lighting Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CFL Technologies LLC v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2018cv01444
Plaintiff:
CFL Technologies LLC
Defendant:
GE Lighting, LLC and General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bell Incorporated v. GE Lighting, LLC
as 4:2013cv04009
Plaintiff:
Bell Incorporated
Defendant:
GE Lighting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Light Transformation Technologies LLC v General Electric Company et al
as 2:2012cv00827
Plaintiff:
Light Transformation Technologies LLC
Defendant:
General Electric Company, GE Lighting Solutions, LLC, GE Lighting, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Robertson Transformer Co. v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2012cv08094
Defendant:
H.B. Etlin Company, Ltd., General Electric Company, GE Lighting, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robertson Transformer Co. doing business as Robertson Worldwide
Intervenor Defendant:
Super X Manufacturing Ltd.
Counter Defendant:
Robertson Transformer Co.
Counter Claimant:
ARN Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
LaFrance v. GE Lighting, LLC et al
as 5:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
Steven LaFrance
Defendant:
GE Lighting, LLC and General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
