Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 569
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. NATS NY Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07895
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: NATS NY Inc. doing business as EZ Pharmacy, Natan Fatakhov, Debarim Inc. doing business as Central Pharmacy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. SMS Therapy Supply, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07862
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: SMS Therapy Supply, Inc., Shushana Mirzokandov and John Doe Defendants "1" through "10"
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Gerling et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv07693
Defendant: Vladimir Granovskiy, Michael Gerling, M.D., NY Orthopedics, P.C. and others
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. MARSH, D.O. et al
as 2:2023cv21192
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: ANTHONY MARSH, D.O., ANTHONY MARSH, D.O. -OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL, PAIN AND REHABILITATION INSTITUTE, P.C. doing business as THE OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, PAIN AND REHABILITATION INSTITUTE, ARTHUR CORETH, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. MetaMed Sports & Supply Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07705
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: MetaMed Sports & Supply Inc., Mikhail Baybekov and John Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Family Rx Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv07291
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Family Rx Corp., Mikhail Kushmakov, Quick Health Pharmacy Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Apex Spine & Orthopaedics, PLLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Apex Spine & Orthopaedics, PLLC, Advanced Pain Consultants, P.A., Erik T. Bendiks, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Cutler, D.P.M. et al
as 1:2023cv23537
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Jonathan Cutler, D.P.M., Central Palm Beach Surgery Center LTD, Spine and Orthopaedic Specialists of Central Florida, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Geico Employees Insurance Company et al v. Mark Allen Silverman, DC et al
as 1:2023cv23470
Plaintiff: Geico Employees Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co., Geico General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Mark Allen Silverman, DC, Gregory Mazzotta, DC and Silverman Chiropractic & Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01836
Defendant: Heather Lee Williams, Heather Lee Tindal, Cynthia Webb and others
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?