Cases 1 - 10 of 508
Thomas Tully v. Gene Johnson
as 22-6362
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS M. TULLY
Respondent / Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Johnson v. Samuel et al
as 4:2020cv01059
Plaintiff:
Johnson and Earl Gene Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Samuel, Larry Abraham, Sarah Samuel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Scales et al
as 4:2020cv00689
Defendant:
Heather S. Weiss, Shipp Daniels and Nathan Scales
Plaintiff:
Earl Gene Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Brantley v. Gene Johnson
as 18-6542
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY BRANTLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director for the VA Department of Corrections
Harry Brantley v. Harold Clarke
as 16-7476
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY BRANTLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Respondent:
GENE JOHNSON, Director for VA Department of Corrections
Brantley v. Johnson
as 1:2016cv00661
Petitioner:
Harry Brantley
Respondent:
Gene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jermaine Pickett v. Gene Johnson
as 15-8016
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERMAINE LORENZO PICKETT
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director Virginia Dept. of Correction
Jeffrey Coleman v. John Jabe
as 15-6975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN JABE, ROBERT BIVENS, HAROLD CLARKE and others
Defendant:
T. JONES, STANLEY YOUNG, K. S. RICHARDSON and others
Piper Rountree v. Tammy Brown
as 15-6655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PIPER ANN ROUNTREE
Defendant - Appellee:
TAMMY BROWN
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARK, JOHN JABE, WENDY HOBBS and others
Corey Coles v. Ralph Northcutt and Spouse
as 14-6006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY COLES
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH NORTHCUTT, Supervisor/Teacher, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, G. ROBINSON, Manager Ombudsman Service Unit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
