Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
101 Frost Street Associates, L.P. et al v. United States Atomic Energy Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03585
Plaintiff: 101 Frost Street Associates, L.P. and Next Millennium Realty, LLC
Defendant: Marvex Finishing & Processing Corporation, Gulf & Western Manufacturing Company, Verizon New York, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Sulzer Metco (US) Inc., Physio Chem Corp., Bronco Baltimore, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Arris Group Inc. et al v. Constellation Technologies LLC et al
as DE/1:14-cv-00114
Plaintiff: Arris Group Inc. , ARRIS Enterprises Inc. , ARRIS Solutions Inc. and others
Defendant: Constellation Technologies LLC and Rockstar Consortium US LP
Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Mobility, et al
as 14-35393
Defendant / Appellant: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. and MOTOROLA, INC.
Amicus Curiae: SAS INSTITUTE INC., SIERRA WIRELESS, INC., INTEL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. et al v. TIVO, INC.
as 2:2013mc00017
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. and GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
Defendant: TIVO, INC.
Counter_claimant: TIVO INC.
Cross_defendant: MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
Counter_defendant: TIME WARNER CABLE INC. and TIME WARNER CABLE LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Motorola Mobility, Inc. et al v. TiVo Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013mc80015
Plaintiff: Motorola Mobility, Inc. and General Instrument Corporation
Defendant: TiVo Inc.
Miscellaneou: Google Inc.
State of New York v. Next Millennium Realty, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2894
Plaintiff - Appellant: State of New York and Joseph Martens, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Evironmental Conservation
Consolidated-Defendant: Adchem Corp., Lincoln Processing Corp., Northern State Realty Co. and others
Third-Party-Defendant: Korg U.S.A. Inc., US-1 Marketing Group Inc., Individually and as successor to Cobraline Manufacturing Corp., Verizon New York, Inc.,, Individually and as Successor to GTE Operations Support Incorporated, GTE Corporation, GTE Sylvania Incorporated, Sylvania Electric Products Incorporated, Verizon Inc., Verizon and others
Defendant: Jerry Goodman, Emily Spiegel, as trustee under an agreement of trust for the benefit of Pamela Spiegel and Lisa Spiegel, Scibelli Brothers Auto Collision, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee: Next Millenium Realty, LLC, 101 Frost Street Associates, L.P., 101 Frost Street Corporation and others
Microsoft Corporation et al v. Motorola Mobility Inc. et al
as 6:2012mc00006
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Defendant: Motorola Mobility Inc. and General Instrument Corporation
Movant: MOSAID Corporation Ltd.
ORBSAK LLC V GENERAL INSTRUMENT
as 02-1296
Defendant-Appellee: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
Plaintiff-Appellant: ORBSAK, L.L.C.
Gen Instrument Corp v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 98-1420
Petitioner: General Instrument Corporation
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner: National Cable Television Association, Inc. and GTE Service Corporation
Intervenor: Tandy Corporation, Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc., Circuit City Stores, Inc. and others
Terminated Party: Consumer Electronics Manufacturers Association and Information Technology Industry Council
Amicus Curiae: Information Technology Industry Council
USA v. Intel Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:1991cv20275
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Intel Corp. and Raytheon Company
Intervenor: Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation , Spectrace Instruments, Inc. , Siltec Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?