Cases 1 - 10 of 49
HOWARD v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
MARTIN M. HOWARD
Cross Claimant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, CORNING, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, CRANE COMPANY, EATON CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant:
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, GTE OPERATIONS SUPPORT, INC., THE OKONITE COMPANY and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
MIGHTY AUTO PARTS and MIGHTY AUTO PARTS WESTERN NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
VOLLMAN v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv02564
Plaintiff:
GREG VOLLMAN
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., AURORA PUMP COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant:
Advanced Thermal Hydronics, LLC, AMERICAN PREMIER UNDERWRITERS, BURNHAM, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, FOSTER -WHEELER LLC, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
RHOADES v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv05844
Cross Defendant:
BEAZER EAST, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., LEONA V. RHOADES and others
Defendant:
ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF, ARVIN MERITOR and others
Counter Claimant:
BASIC, INC.
Cross Claimant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, HONEYWELL, INC., INGERSOLL-RAND & CO. and others
Respondent:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Barbara Mann v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 21-2361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA MANN, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD NYBECK
Defendant / Appellee:
AO SMITH CORP, ALLEN BRADLEY CO, CT CORPORATION SYSTEMS, ARVIN MERITOR, SUCCESSOR TO ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING and others
Appellee:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST
Defendant:
ALLEN BRADLEY CO and RAYLOC COMPANY
HAMMELL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Cross Claimant:
ARVINMERITOR, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CRANE CO. and others
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX, LLC., STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAMMELL and LINDA HAMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Wohlfert v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05040
Plaintiff:
Wayne Wohlfert
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, ABB, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
PINE v. AURORA PUMP et al
as 2:2018cv00927
Cross Claimant:
STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., CARRIER CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant:
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., GEORGIA PACIFIC, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. and others
Cross Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, WARREN PUMPS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LYDIA PINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RICHARDS et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00861
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO. and others
Cross Claimant:
AURORA PUMP, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G RICHARDS and GEORGETTA RICHARDS
Cross Defendant:
PEP BOYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
David Martincic, et al v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 20-3068
Defendant / Appellee:
AURORA PUMPS, SAUER INC, SWINDELL-DRESSLER INTERNATIONAL CO and others
Defendant:
BMI REFRACTORY SERVICES INC, SULZER PUMPS SOLUTIONS INC, FKA Ahlstrom Pumps LLC, EICHLEAY CORP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MERL WILLIAMS, His Husband and DAVID P. MARTINCIC
Rodriguez v. Genuine Parts Co.
as 3:2021cv01208
Plaintiff:
Hector Rodriguez
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company and Genuine Parts Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
