Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Antonetti v. FNU Santistefan, et al
as 24-2014
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant:
FNU SANTISTEFAN, FNU MARTINEZ, Warden, FNU BROWN, Warden and others
Antonetti v. Santistefan, et al
as 23-2060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU SANTISTEFAN, FNU MARTINEZ, Warden, FNU BROWN, Warden and others
Antonetti v. Santistefan, et al
as 23-2009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU SANTISTEFAN, FNU MARTINEZ, Warden, FNU BROWN, Warden and others
Rudy Franco v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 22-16315
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUDY ARMENTA FRANCO
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA, STATE OF, DAVID SHINN, Director, A.D.O.C. RR Director and GEO CORPORATION, referred to in caption of amended complaint as GEO Corp./ Secure Security - Private Facility at Kingman
HAMPTON v. GEO, CORP. et al
as 1:2021cv02025
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. HAMPTON
Defendant:
GEO, CORP., TORRES, C. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonetti v. Santistefan et al
as 1:2021cv00279
Defendant:
FNU Buckalew, FNU Brown, FNU Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSHING v. FREEMAN et al
as 1:2021cv00091
Defendant:
DUNN, FRENCH, WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RUSHING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boutte' v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2020cv00329
Defendant:
April Cider, Deputies, Indiana Senator and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Scott Boutte'
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maltos v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00986
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Ralph Hanson and Federal Bureau of Prison/ Through GEO-Corp.
Petitioner:
Augustine Garcia Maltos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maltos v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00181
Petitioner:
Augustine Garcia Maltos
Defendant:
United States of America
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prison/ Through GEO-Corp., United States Department of Justice and Ralph Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
