Cases 51 - 60 of 123
THE ESTATE OF ULISSES M. RODRIGUEZ et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2018cv04547
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF ULISSES M. RODRIGUEZ and JESSIE INEZ RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER JOHNSON, CORRECTIONS OFFICER MCGEE, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BALTIMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2018cv04755
Petitioner:
RONALD LONG
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv04260
Petitioner:
JULIUS DAVIS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and GEORGE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv01201
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ROBINSON
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Gribble Resort Properties, LLC et al (PLR2)
as 3:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gribble Resort Properties, LLC , Meagan Ellis and George Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2018cv02512
Petitioner:
JAMES WOODS
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2018cv06135
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MARTINEZ v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv01493
Petitioner:
JOHN MARTINEZ
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darby v. Witty et al
as 2:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Darby, III
Defendant:
Karey L. Witty, Ralf Sulke, John Deghetto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANAMAN v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv01003
Plaintiff:
CHARLES VANAMAN
Defendant:
GEORGE ROBINSON, GANJI, VALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
