Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Love v. State of Michigan
as 2:2026cv12166
Petitioner:
Gerrard Elihu Love
Respondent:
State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael White v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 26-1565
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WHITE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ESTATE OF DETECTIVE LAWRENCE GERRARD, ESTATE OF LT WILLIAM SHELTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01558
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Brannon v. City of Mountain View, et al
as 4:2026cv01419
Plaintiff:
Tyrel Gerrard Brannon
Defendant:
City of Mountain View and Officer Sausalito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Lee County Arkansas et al
as 2:2025cv00259
Plaintiff:
Pamela Webb
Defendant:
Lee County Arkansas, Rusty Crump, Junious Pruett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Bashar Robert Elyousef v. Joseph Hardy et al
as 2:2025cv12042
Plaintiff:
Bashar Robert Elyousef
Defendant:
Judge Joseph Hardy, Judge Nancy Allf, Commissioner Jay Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Schwall et al
as 1:2025cv07307
Plaintiff:
Gerrard Jackson
Defendant:
Craig L. Schwall, Tanya F. Miller and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doe et al
as 6:2025cv02127
Plaintiff:
Gerrard Jones
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Florida Department of Corrections Central Florida Reception and Medical Center and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Faulkner v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 25-6672
Plaintiff:
SCOTT JOSEPH FAULKNER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CHAD BLANCO, BERNART and others
Gerrard v. Orchard Park Hospital, LLC
as 5:2025cv00230
Plaintiff:
Melanie Gerrard
Defendant:
Orchard Park Hospital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
