Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robert Bostic v. Sumter County Police Department
as 24-6351
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LAWRENCE BOSTIC
Defendant:
CITY OF SUMTER COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JESSICA HATCHLEY, HEATH L. GARDNER and others
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Binns v. Coles et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Gregory Binns
Defendant:
SGT. Coles, LT. Riggsby, K9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bostic v. City of Sumter County Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert Lawrence Bostic, Robert L. Bostic and Robert Bostic
Defendant:
City of Sumter County Police Department, Jessica Hatchley, Hsath L. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gill v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Raymond Gill
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
