Cases 31 - 40 of 167
Gill v. Pikula
as 1:2020cv06849
Defendant:
David A Pikula
Plaintiff:
Kevin R Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Varnold v. Lamano et al
as 4:2020cv04219
Plaintiff:
Christina Joy Varnold
Defendant:
Jeremy Hurst Lamano, Judge, David Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gill v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2020cv05552
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Plaintiff:
Garylyn Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gills v. Jeffreys et al
as 4:2020cv04183
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys and W Rankins
Plaintiff:
Jaryan Gills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gills v. Jeffreys et al
as 4:2020cv04187
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys and W Rankin
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jaryan Gills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spruill, as legal guardian and next friend of "D.N.S.," a minor v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv04927
Defendant:
Sherry Ball, Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Leslie Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Spruill, as legal guardian and next friend of "D.N.S.," a minor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Winkle v. Stevens Trucking Company et al
as 3:2020cv00771
Defendant:
Michael Amzy Gill, Stevens Trucking Company and Michael Gill
Plaintiff:
Preston WInkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02598
Plaintiff:
Eddie Gill
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
