Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02213
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02212
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01035
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Chavez Aguilar v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Chicago Field Office et al
as 1:2017cv02296
Plaintiff:
Rony Chavez Aguilar
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Chicago Field Office , Glenn Triveline , Thomas Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00561
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07645
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hans Keil v. Glenn Triveline, et al
as 11-1647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hans Joachim Keil
Defendant - Appellee:
Glenn Triveline, Laura Foster, Michael Spinella and others
Alvarado v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Citizenship and Immigrant Services, et al
as 1:2010cv01669
Defendant:
Glenn Triveline, Eric Holder, Ricardo Wong and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Keil v. Triveline et al
as 6:2009cv03417
Plaintiff:
Hans Joachim Keil
Defendant:
Glenn Triveline, Laura Foster, Michael Spinella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sucic Zlatan v. Glenn Triveline, et al
as 09-3123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUCIC ZLATAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN TRIVELINE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
