Cases 21 - 30 of 164
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
Bennett v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Bennett
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee, Chad Graham, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5575
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
Ewing et al v. Wayne County Sheriff
as 2:2022cv11453
Plaintiff:
Darrell R. Ewing, Roderick Graham, Lamont Lofton and others
Defendant:
Wayne County Sheriff
William Graham v. John Gilley
as 22-5423
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN GILLEY, Warden
William Graham v. John Gilley
as 22-5412
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN GILLEY, Warden
Davis v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr, Warden Civile, Director of NCR FBOP Barb Von Blanckness and others
Defendant:
USP McCreary, AI Unit Manager Clark, Counselor Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Graham v. Gilley
as 6:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. USA
as 6:2022cv00067
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
